Skip links
Trademark Non-Use

When Trademark Non-Use is Excusable

Since trademarks can last indefinitely, maintaining them throughout a business's lifecycle can be challenging, particularly when unforeseen circumstances disrupt their use. While continuous use is crucial for preserving strong trademark rights, certain situations allow for non-use to be excused. Don't let temporary setbacks jeopardize your brand's protection; our latest blog equips you with the knowledge to safeguard your valuable trademark rights!

Understanding Trademark Non-Use and Excusable Circumstances

Trademarks are valuable assets for businesses, which serve as powerful tools to help businesses distinguish their goods and services from their competitors. However, maintaining a trademark requires more than just registering it; continuous use in commerce is crucial to preserve trademark rights. But what happens when circumstances prevent a business from using its trademark? The trademark office understands that sometimes special situations arise which prevents a business from using its trademark.  This is where the concept of “excusable non-use” comes into play, offering a lifeline for trademark owners facing exceptional situations of trademark non-use.

Trademark non-use
To maintain trademark protections, trademarks require use. However, in certain circumstances, trademark non-use will not impact trademark protection.

Excusable non-use occurs when special circumstances beyond the trademark owner’s control cause a temporary interruption in the use of the mark. This concept is particularly relevant when it’s time for trademark owners to file maintenance documents with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), such as a Declaration of Use. Normally, these declarations require verification that the registered trademark is in use in commerce to prevent cancellation. However, in certain situations of trademark non-use, trademark owners can file a Declaration of Excusable Nonuse to explain why their mark was not in use, saving its registration.

Special Circumstances Qualifying for Excusable Trademark Non-Use

The USPTO recognizes several special circumstances that may constitute excusable non-use. One such circumstance is a trade embargo. If a trademark owner is willing and able to use the mark in commerce but is prevented from doing so due to a trade embargo or other circumstances beyond their control, this may be considered excusable non-use. For instance, a company manufacturing products in a country subject to sudden trade restrictions might find itself unable to import and sell its goods in the United States, temporarily halting the use of its trademark.

Another scenario that may qualify as excusable non-use is the sale of a business. The process of transferring ownership and operations can sometimes lead to a temporary interruption in the use of a trademark. However, it’s important to note that this is not an automatic excuse; the specific circumstances surrounding the sale and the efforts to resume use promptly will be considered by the USPTO.

Natural disasters, often referred to as “acts of God,” can also provide grounds for excusable non-use. Events such as fires, floods, earthquakes, or even pandemics may also disrupt business operations and prevent the use of a trademark. Another weather related event, such as a hurricane may destroy a manufacturing facility causing a temporary cessation of product production and, consequently, use of the associated trademark.

The Impact of Trademark Non-Use on Enforcement

The impact of excusable non-use on trademark enforcement is significant. When a trademark owner successfully demonstrates excusable non-use, they can maintain their registration and continue to enjoy the benefits of federal trademark protection. This includes the right to enforce their mark against potential infringers, even during the period of non-use. Without the provision for excusable non-use, trademark owners facing temporary setbacks might lose their registrations and, consequently, their ability to prevent others from using similar marks.

However, it’s important to note that while excusable non-use can protect a trademark registration, it doesn’t necessarily strengthen the mark itself. Continuous use in commerce is still the best way to build and maintain strong trademark rights. The longer a mark is in use, the more recognition it gains in the marketplace, and the stronger it becomes. This is particularly important for descriptive marks that rely on acquired distinctiveness through use to maintain their trademark status.

Claiming Excusable Trademark Non-Use: Process and Documentation

The process of claiming excusable non-use requires careful documentation and explanation. Trademark owners must file a Declaration of Excusable Nonuse with the USPTO, stating when use of the trademark in U.S. commerce stopped, the approximate date when use is expected to resume, and a detailed description of the facts showing that non-use is due to special circumstances beyond their control. It’s crucial to demonstrate that there is no intention to abandon the trademark.

After filing the Declaration of Excusable Nonuse, the USPTO will review the provided information to determine if it establishes excusable non-use. If accepted, the trademark registration will remain active. However, if the USPTO believes the evidence is insufficient, they will issue a post-registration office action, giving the trademark owner an opportunity to provide additional evidence and explanation. If the trademark owner fails to convince the USPTO that the non-use is excusable, the registration may be canceled.

The Importance of Continuous Trademark Use

The importance of continuing to use trademarks cannot be overstated. Regular use in commerce not only maintains the legal rights associated with the mark but also strengthens its distinctiveness and recognition in the marketplace. Continuous use helps build consumer association between the mark and the goods or services it represents, which is the essence of trademark protection. Moreover, consistent use can lead to “incontestable” status after five years of registration, providing even stronger legal protection for the mark.

Conclusion: Balancing Trademark Non-Use and Brand Protection

In conclusion, while excusable non-use provides a valuable safety net for trademark owners facing extraordinary circumstances, it should be viewed as a last resort rather than a regular strategy. Trademark owners should strive to maintain continuous use of their marks whenever possible. When faced with potential interruptions in use, it’s crucial to document the circumstances thoroughly and take proactive steps to resume use as soon as practicable. If you have questions about maintaining your trademark and whether your use, or non-use will impact your tradmeark rights, please contact on of our experienced trademark attorneys.  By understanding the concept of excusable non-use and the importance of continuous use, trademark owners can better navigate challenges and maintain strong, enforceable trademark rights.